Commercial decisions are only as good as the information behind them.
Every piece of work we do starts with a commercial question.
Has our pricing strategy delivered the result we expected? Why has competitiveness changed? Are competitors reacting to us? Is this a technical issue, or is the market moving?
These are the kinds of questions we help insurers answer every day. While internal data provides valuable insight into business performance, understanding what’s really driving change often requires an independent view of the wider market.
This case study explores how we helped one of our clients – a UK insurance Intermediary – answer those questions, providing the evidence and confidence needed to make better commercial decisions.
Why didn’t our rate change have the impact we expected?
Reducing rates should improve competitiveness. But markets don’t always behave in a predictable way.
The client came to us after introducing a planned premium rate reduction. The expectation was clear, but the results on one comparison website didn’t reflect the improvement they had anticipated.
Rather than taking the headline figures at face value, we dug deeper.
Our analysts examined competitor pricing movements, comparison website dynamics and changes in the mix of risks entering the market. We also modelled how the client would have performed had the rate reduction never been introduced, allowing us to separate the impact of the pricing decision from wider market movements.
The findings told a very different story.
The pricing strategy had achieved its objective, but the impact had been temporarily masked by changes elsewhere in the market. By isolating those external influences, we demonstrated that the rate reduction was delivering exactly as intended.
Without that insight, the client could easily have responded by making further pricing changes that weren’t needed. Instead, they had the confidence to stay the course, knowing the original strategy was delivering the intended commercial outcome.
Why has our quotability dropped?
Not every change in performance is caused by pricing.
During our routine market monitoring, we identified an unexpected drop in the client’s quotability on one comparison website. The client’s own reporting suggested everything was operating normally, prompting a deeper investigation.
Our insight and data services teams analysed market-wide quotability, isolated the affected risks and reviewed live customer journeys to understand where the discrepancy lay.
The investigation traced the issue to the way voluntary excess values were being displayed. Although the client was returning the correct value, part of the comparison website transformation process was presenting it incorrectly, creating a live quoting issue that wasn’t visible through internal reporting.
By providing supporting evidence and live quote references, we enabled the client to quickly identify the root cause and resolve the issue before it had a wider impact on competitiveness. Just as importantly, it prevented the business from wasting valuable time investigating what initially appeared to be a market issue but was, in fact, a technical one.
Are competitors reacting, or is the market moving?
Understanding competitor behaviour is about more than monitoring prices. The real challenge is knowing whether changes in the market are a direct response to your own actions or simply part of wider market movement.
The client asked us to help answer exactly that question.
We analysed competitor pricing behaviour alongside broader market movements and comparison website dynamics to understand what was really driving the changes they were seeing.
Our analysis showed that a key competitor had not changed its rates in response to the client’s pricing strategy. Instead, the movements reflected broader market conditions rather than a direct competitive reaction.
That distinction gave the client confidence to avoid reacting unnecessarily. Rather than responding to perceived competitor activity, they were able to make decisions based on a clear understanding of what was actually happening across the market.
What market developments should we be paying attention to?
Markets evolve constantly. New competitors enter, products change and pricing strategies adapt. The challenge isn’t spotting those developments. It’s understanding which ones are commercially significant.
The client regularly asks us for an independent view of what’s changing across the market and, more importantly, what those changes are likely to mean for the business.
Rather than simply reporting competitor activity, we assess its commercial significance. That includes monitoring new entrants, analysing product developments and evaluating emerging pricing strategies. For example, when new providers entered the home insurance market with higher excess levels, we investigated whether this represented an emerging trend, assessed the impact on competitiveness and helped the client understand whether it warranted a strategic response.
That means the client can focus attention where it matters most, distinguishing meaningful market shifts from short-term activity and making strategic decisions with a broader understanding of where the market is heading.
An independent extension of the team
Today, the client continues to use us as an independent extension of its pricing and commercial teams.
We help validate pricing decisions, investigate unexpected changes in performance, interpret competitor behaviour and make sense of wider market developments. Sometimes that means providing reassurance that a strategy is working as intended. Other times, it means uncovering an issue that would otherwise have gone unnoticed.
Every piece of work starts with a commercial question. Every answer gives greater confidence in the decisions they make next.
Submit a comment